Links
American Academy of Pediatrics article
Link Posted on Updated on
NO CIGAR American Academy of Pediatrics
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2014/01/22/peds.2013-3793.full.pdf+html
Article brings up some important items but still ignores the fact that there is no research on just infants age birth to 6 months. Thought it was strange that even with obvious cited research not showing less than 6 moths only, it still damned Dr. Millers for not having any infants under 5 months? Also, there is research available that concludes that birth injuries can cause CML type images, besides the ones sited in the article (breech and club conditions), Also of note, it makes it sound like rib injuries are specific for abuse and at the same time says that birth trauma may cause them. There is also research available that states that Shoulder Dystocia and high birth weight can be responsible for rib injuries. My point for venting is that even though the article has good things, like ensuring doctors check for all other possible conditions it fails in my opinion at clearing up some major issues for those accused of abuse when the infants presenting with suspicious injuries are less than 6 months. Thought it interesting that with the resent article doubting Dr Klienmans research on CML’s in the AJR that he was not cited. Yet CML’s were several times listed as abuse indicators.
1st- the ongoing battle in the medical community concerning false allegations based on incomplete med research
http://voices.yahoo.com/x-ray-images-determining-abuse-debate-12543725.html?cat=70
2nd- SBS is so ingrained in the minds of so many, yet even with facts showing other causes of injuries the prosecutors are still pursuing the SBS angle
http://voices.yahoo.com/shaken-baby-syndrome-fading-time-12574345.html?cat=70
3rd- So few are aware of the atrocities taking place in our court rooms The Pelletier case is one of thousands nationwide!
PLEASE READ THESE….AND HELP ME GET THE INFORMATION OUT
ANOTHER SHAKEN BABY CASE BEING DISPUTED!!
Link Posted on
ANOTHER SHAKEN BABY CASE BEING DISPUTED!!!
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2014/04/17/rene-bailey-shaken-baby-science/7817079/
Until the public becomes aware and educated that sometimes …SOMETIMES… its not abuse! sometimes injuries that can occur from shaking can also be caused by other means.
District Attorneys and state case workers are so determined to justify their actions that they only focus on the negative instead of the child’s best interest. They acquire experts that will only see the old science evidence and argue that the new science is not any good? Really? everyone knows that the judge doesn’t want anything to do with cases involving child abuse, as he could make a bad opinion. What judges do is rely on the DA’s and the state to handle this and get it off of their docket,
Child Advocates…A must read!
Link Posted on
If you believe you are a real child Advocate. READ THIS!!!
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2